Powertrain range
CX-5: Engine 2.5L I-4; Output 187 hp. Rogue: Powertrain 1.5L variable-compression turbo three-cylinder; Output 201 hp.
Configuration-aware comparison
The Rogue is the efficient, lower-priced choice: EPA rates it 32 mpg combined with front-wheel drive against 26 for the CX-5, and it starts about $2,700 less. The CX-5 offers standard all-wheel drive and Google built-in on every trim, but its 187-horsepower engine has no hybrid until 2027.
The Rogue is the efficient, lower-priced choice: EPA rates it 32 mpg combined with front-wheel drive against 26 for the CX-5, and it starts about $2,700 less. The CX-5 offers standard all-wheel drive and Google built-in on every trim, but its 187-horsepower engine has no hybrid until 2027.
The 2026 CX-5 has one powertrain, a 2.5-liter four-cylinder with 187 horsepower, rated 24 city, 30 highway and 26 combined mpg by the EPA, and CarGurus (opens in a new tab) calls the carried-over engine and its six-speed automatic relics next to rivals that now offer hybrids, adding that the CX-5 has no hybrid option until 2027 and advising those who want efficiency or performance to wait for it. The Rogue uses a 1.5-liter three-cylinder turbo, rated 29/36 and 32 combined with front-wheel drive and 28/35 and 31 with all-wheel drive. Revved Up Cars (opens in a new tab) puts that gap at 32 mpg combined against 26.
Revved Up Cars lists the Rogue at $29,000 against $31,700 for the CX-5, a difference of $2,700. The CX-5's counterweight is that all-wheel drive is standard on every trim, which CarGurus notes alongside Google built-in as a first in the segment; the Rogue is sold with front- or all-wheel drive, so the cheapest Rogue does not include it. The Rogue Rock Creek, in CarGurus's words, adds all-wheel drive, all-terrain tires, a roof rack, a surround-view camera and hill-descent control for buyers who want off-road looks and gear.
The 2026 CX-5 is longer, wider and more spacious than the model it replaces, and CarGurus says rear passenger space and cargo room have noticeably improved; its verdict is that it is one of the best-looking and best-equipped compact crossovers, held back by a sluggish, thirsty powertrain and interior quirks. Nissan's own comparison page (opens in a new tab), a manufacturer source, claims 36.5 cubic feet of cargo volume for the Rogue against 33.7 for the CX-5. CarGurus's verdict on the Rogue is that its reasonable price and array of comfort and tech features aim it at the heart of the segment.
No. CarGurus (opens in a new tab) says there is no CX-5 hybrid option until 2027; the 2026 model uses a 187-horsepower 2.5-liter four-cylinder.
On the CX-5, yes: it is standard on every trim. The Rogue is sold with front-wheel drive or all-wheel drive.
The Rogue. EPA ratings are 32 combined mpg with front-wheel drive and 31 with all-wheel drive, against 26 combined for the CX-5.
Ranges and maximums describe family-level possibilities. Open each vehicle record before treating a number or feature as applicable to a particular trim.
What separates them
This comparison does not force a universal winner. It identifies the configuration question that matters for each use case.
CX-5: Engine 2.5L I-4; Output 187 hp. Rogue: Powertrain 1.5L variable-compression turbo three-cylinder; Output 201 hp.
The CX-5 is represented with AWD; the Rogue with FWD / AWD. Standard status must be checked by trim.
The CX-5 comes in 5 trims and the Rogue in 5. Package combinations can create additional builds.
No model-level tow maximum is used without a configuration check. The most the 2025 Nissan Rogue is published to tow is 1,500 lb.
Seating for 5 is published for the 2026 CX-5. The 2025 Nissan Rogue seats 5 (compact SUV).
Model-year note: the Nissan Rogue figures below come from EPA's 2026 records, the nearest model year EPA lists for it.
Side-by-side matrix
| Decision field | Mazda CX-5 | Nissan Rogue |
|---|---|---|
| Exact EPA records | 1 | 3 |
| Model / option labels | 1 | 3 |
| Drive layouts | 4-Wheel Drive | All-Wheel Drive, Front-Wheel Drive |
| Engines / propulsion | 2.5L 4-cyl SIDI | 1.5L 3-cyl SIDI |
| Transmissions | Automatic (S6) | Automatic (AV-S8) |
| Fuel types | Regular | Regular |
| EPA classes | Small Sport Utility Vehicle 4WD | Small Sport Utility Vehicle 2WD, Small Sport Utility Vehicle 4WD |
| Combined efficiency | 26 MPG/MPGe | 29–32 MPG/MPGe |
| Electric range | Not listed | Not listed |
| Annual fuel / energy estimate | $2500 per year | $2050–2250 per year |
Head to head
| Measure | Mazda CX-5 | Nissan Rogue |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price (KBB base) | $31,485 | $30,635 |
| Top trim price (KBB base) | $40,485 | $40,535 |
| Horsepower | 187 hp | 201 hp |
| Torque | 186 lb-ft | 225 lb-ft |
| 0 to 60 mph | 9.6 sec | n/a |
| Curb weight | 3,856 lb | 3,607-3,737 lb |
| Length | 184.6 in | 183 in |
| Wheelbase | 110.8 in | 106.5 in |
| Cargo volume | 66.5 cu ft | 74.1 cu ft |
| Towing capacity | 1,500 lb | 1,500 lb |
| Seating | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Basic warranty | 3 years | 3 years |
Figures are ranges across each model’s trims from Kelley Blue Book records (2026 model year); prices are KBB base prices.
Background on each vehicle
The Mazda CX-5 is a compact crossover SUV produced by Mazda since 2012, a successor to both the Tribute and the slightly larger CX-7. It is Mazda's first model to feature the "Kodo" design language and the first model to be fully developed with a range of technologies branded as Skyactiv, including a rigid, lightweight platform combined with a series of engines and transmissions to reduce emissions and fuel consumption.
Source: Mazda CX-5 (Wikipedia)
NHTSA rated the 2025 Mazda CX-5 overall 5 of 5 stars, front crash 5 of 5 stars, side crash 5 of 5 stars, rollover 4 of 5 stars.
Owners filed 14 complaints with NHTSA for the 2026 Mazda CX-5, most often about unknown or other (6), electrical system (5), visibility/wiper (3).
The Nissan Rogue is a compact crossover SUV produced by the Japanese automobile manufacturer Nissan. It made its debut in October 2007 for the 2008 model year. Beginning in 2013 for the 2014 model year, the model has been merged with the X-Trail sold outside the North American market, making them identical.
Source: Nissan Rogue (Wikipedia)
NHTSA rated the 2025 Nissan Rogue overall 5 of 5 stars, front crash 4 of 5 stars, side crash 5 of 5 stars, rollover 4 of 5 stars.
Owners filed 182 complaints with NHTSA for the 2025 Nissan Rogue, most often about unknown or other (75), visibility/wiper (48), visibility (31).
Comparison answer desk
The 2026 Nissan Rogue lists the higher combined-efficiency midpoint in this snapshot (30.5 vs. the 2026 Mazda CX-5's 26 MPG/MPGe).
4.5 combined MPG/MPGe separates the 2026 Mazda CX-5 from the 2026 Nissan Rogue at the midpoint, a relative difference of 17.3%.
No. The 2026 Mazda CX-5 lists 4-Wheel Drive while the 2026 Nissan Rogue lists All-Wheel Drive, Front-Wheel Drive: no drive designation appears on both current lineups.
No. Their current engine or propulsion descriptions do not overlap. The 2026 Mazda CX-5 lists 2.5L 4-cyl SIDI. The 2026 Nissan Rogue lists 1.5L 3-cyl SIDI.
No shared transmission description between the 2026 Mazda CX-5 and the 2026 Nissan Rogue in this snapshot. 2026 Mazda CX-5: Automatic (S6). 2026 Nissan Rogue: Automatic (AV-S8).
Yes, entirely: the 2026 Mazda CX-5 and the 2026 Nissan Rogue both run on Regular and nothing else in this snapshot.
Yes, at least partly: the 2026 Mazda CX-5 and the 2026 Nissan Rogue are both categorized under Conventional in this snapshot.
The 2026 Nissan Rogue lists the lower annual-cost estimate midpoint than the 2026 Mazda CX-5 ($2,150 vs. $2,500).
$350 per year separates the 2026 Mazda CX-5 from the 2026 Nissan Rogue at the midpoint under EPA's standardized assumptions.
The 2026 Nissan Rogue spans a wider combined-MPG range across its own current configurations than the 2026 Mazda CX-5 does (3 points vs. 0).
Partly. The 2026 Mazda CX-5 and the 2026 Nissan Rogue overlap on Small Sport Utility Vehicle 4WD, but the 2026 Nissan Rogue also carries Small Sport Utility Vehicle 2WD.
The 2026 Nissan Rogue, with 3 certification records against the 2026 Mazda CX-5's 1.
Open the evidence
Each record includes its trim map, direct answers, applicability statements and manufacturer source trail.
Nearby comparisons
Each comparison keeps configuration differences intact, not declaring one universal winner.