Original research

The structure behind the specification.

9 reproducible studies of how trims, powertrains and capability claims are actually configured, built from 1,204 EPA certification records across 344 current model families and 435 editorially researched vehicle-year records. Two audit editorial coverage, one scales to the complete current market, and the rest each calculate a single question, drivetrain availability, electrification, energy cost, configuration complexity, EPA class distribution or premium-fuel exposure, across that full census. Every study states its scope before its result, publishes the method as steps a reader can re-run, and links the source records behind every figure, so a claim here can be checked, not taken on trust.

Study 001 · Aug. 17, 2026

2026 compact SUV configuration index

A descriptive audit of seven current U.S.-market SUVs: 7 vehicle records, 44 direct answers and 24 attached source records.

Open the study and data table →
Study 002 · Aug. 17, 2026

Vehicle trim complexity index

A complete audit of every published vehicle-year record, trim position, direct answer and attached source in the expanded catalog.

Open the complete catalog study →
Study 003 · Aug. 17, 2026

Current U.S. vehicle configuration census

The full market-scale audit: 344 model families, 1,053 EPA labels and 1,204 certification records.

Open the complete current-market census →
Studies 004–009 · Aug. 17, 2026

Current-market intelligence series

Six complete calculated tables covering drivetrain availability, electrification, energy cost, configuration complexity, EPA classes and premium-fuel exposure.

Open the six-study series →
StudyCoverageScopeOpen
001-2026 compact SUV configuration index7 vehicle recordsDescriptive record auditOpen →
002: Vehicle trim complexity index435 vehicle-year recordsPublication inventoryOpen →
003: Current U.S. vehicle configuration census48 makes2025–2026 EPA marketOpen →
004–009: Current-market intelligence series1,204 certification recordsDownloadable JSONOpen →
01

Bounded claims

Each study states whether it describes an editorial sample or the complete EPA current-market snapshot.

02

Reproducible counts

Trim, answer and source counts are generated from the same records readers can open and inspect.

03

Versioned scope

The study states its model year, market, access date and inclusion rules so later changes can be compared honestly.

Key points
  • 9 original studies built from 1,204 EPA certification records across 344 current model families.
  • Every study states its scope, publishes its method, and links the records behind each figure.
  • The six market-intelligence studies publish downloadable calculated tables.
  • Certification data carries no trim names: these studies measure configurations, not marketing.

Reading the result

How to read this library

Why this research exists

Most vehicle questions have no single answer at the nameplate level. Towing capacity, fuel economy, range and available equipment all change between configurations of the same model in the same year, and the figures quoted in advertising typically describe the most favourable one.

These studies work at the level the data is actually recorded. 1,204 EPA certification records grouped into 344 model families, so a claim can be traced to the record that supports it.

  • Model-level answers are frequently wrong at configuration level
  • Advertised figures usually describe the most favourable configuration
  • Certification records are the primary source, not a summary of one
  • Every published figure links back to the record behind it

What separates a study from a listicle

Three things: a stated scope, a reproducible method, and a source trail. Each study says whether it describes a bounded editorial sample or the complete EPA snapshot, publishes the steps used to calculate its table, and links the records a reader can inspect.

That structure exists so a result can be challenged. A figure that cannot be reproduced from a named source is an assertion, and the automotive space is full of assertions repeated until they read as facts.

  • Scope stated before the result, not after
  • Method published as steps that can be re-run
  • Source records linked instead of summarized
  • Corrections process published and used

How the studies fit together

Studies 001 and 002 audit editorial coverage: how many trim positions, direct answers and source records sit behind the vehicles researched in depth. Study 003 scales up to the whole current market. Studies 004 through 009 each take one question, drivetrain availability, electrification, energy cost, configuration complexity, EPA class distribution and premium-fuel exposure, and calculate it across that full census.

Read together they answer a single question in layers: how much variation hides behind a vehicle's name, and what that means for anyone trying to compare two of them.

  • 001–002: publication coverage audits, bounded samples
  • 003: complete current-market census
  • 004–009: single-question calculations across the full census
  • All six market studies publish downloadable tables

Limits worth stating plainly

None of these studies weight by sales volume, so a make with one specialty model carries the same row as a make with a full lineup. None of them describe pricing, availability or what sits on a dealer lot.

Certification data also carries no marketed trim names, which means these studies can tell you how much variation exists within a nameplate but not which trim carries which figure. That question is answered by the original window sticker for a specific vehicle.

Common questions

Frequently asked

What is in The Vehicle Standard research library?

9 original studies covering 344 current model families, 1,204 EPA certification records and 435 editorially researched vehicle-year records. Every study publishes its method and links back to the records used to calculate it.

Where does the underlying data come from?

U.S. Department of Energy and Environmental Protection Agency certification records published at FuelEconomy.gov, plus manufacturer specifications and NHTSA safety data for the editorial vehicle records. Each study names its sources and its access date.

Can I cite these studies?

Yes, with attribution and a link. Each study states whether it describes a bounded editorial sample or the complete current-market snapshot, and a bounded sample should not be represented as market-wide data.

How current is the data?

The market studies use the EPA snapshot updated 2026-09-24, covering the 2025 and 2026 model years. Each page states its own coverage and access date instead of implying the data is continuously live.

Why do the studies count configurations instead of trims?

EPA certifies configurations: records created whenever a combination of engine, transmission, drivetrain or body produces a different efficiency result. Trims are marketing bundles with no standard definition, and certification data carries no trim names.

Can I download the data?

The six market-intelligence studies publish their calculated tables as downloadable JSON, so any figure can be reproduced or challenged, not taken on trust.